To save our currency, the Fed must get very aggressive with interest rate hikes and reign in the supply of dollars that have flooded the world over the past few years. The federal government must also do its part by cutting spending, which means no more stimulus and no more bailouts. Undoubtedly, these actions will have unpleasant economic and political consequences. A student who studies harder may have to miss a party or two. A simple analogy, but unfortunately it is that simple.
Even in the unlikely event that our political leaders take these courageous steps, the near-term trajectory of the dollar may still be uncertain. A dollar rally that results from higher interest rates and a narrowing federal deficit may soon fade as the recessionary forces that such moves would unleash act to weaken the dollar once again. But at least we would be building a foundation upon which the dollar could eventually find some footing.
With a restructured economy, higher savings, more capital investment, lower government deficits, and higher interest rates, the United States would once again attract international investment. Funds would flow here not out of fear, as they did last year, but out of confidence. The dollar's strength would not rest on the willingness of foreign governments to buy our debt, but the willingness of foreign consumers to buy our products.
Only then could King Dollar regain its throne (Source Youtube)
Tags:
larouche Peter Schiff report Gold Silver FIAT Money FED china food crisis oil inflation hyperinflation stagflation civil unrest united stated news silver stock market investment fed ben bernanke audit ron paul peter soros weimar germany obama deception the fall of republic gerald celente
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
MARC FABER NEWS
Moneycontrol.com | Dr. Doom? Marc Faber Sees Stock Buying Opportunity CNBC.com The dean of doom, Marc Faber, told CNBC on Tuesday that a variety of asset classes—including equities—may be worth buying for short-term gains. In the midst of market volatility on concerns over Federal Reserve tapering, he said, "Treasury bonds ... Marc Faber Marc Faber aka Dr. Doom: S&P 500 Index Could Fall 20% To 30% Easily Dr Doom warns stocks are oversold but S&P readies for another drop |
Marc Faber Forecasts 30% Stock Market Crash, Says Buy Gold The Market Oracle The Fed's 'tapering' comments have ramped up market volatilaty and Faber gives some advice for short and long-term strategies. For example: ""The best course of action is to actually not buy anything, but rather to reduce positions on a rebound," Faber ... |
Marc Faber: Bull in the short term, bear in the long term MarketWatch (blog) ... so perhaps it's best left to someone who has historically said “sell.” Marc Faber, author of the ”The Gloom, Boom & Doom Report,” and often called “Dr. Doom” because of his bearish sentiment, says there are buying opportunities — at least in the ... |
Business Insider | Marc Faber: Gold a possible canary in the deflation coalmine MarketWatch (blog) Here's what Marc Faber, editor of Gloom Boom Doom report told MarketWatch in an email. “Maybe gold is signaling a deflationary collapse of all asset prices. If this were indeed the case I suppose I would rather own gold than government bonds, high ... MARC FABER: The Way Things Are Going, Bernanke Will Have To Give Us 96 ... "Incredibly Bad Sentiment" Makes Gold & Bonds a Buy Says Marc Faber, as All ... “Sentiment on Gold and Bonds Incredibly Negative” – Marc Faber Predicts ... |
Marc Faber Sees Further Downside CNBC.com China's factory output weakened to a 9-month low today, and financials saw a huge sell-off today, with the FM traders; and The Gloom, Boom and Doom Report's Marc Faber, shares his economic outlook. There's plenty of room for the stock market to decline ... Marc Faber: More S&P downside, commodities 'horrible'…except gold |
Marc Faber says 'thanks' to Bernanke MarketWatch (blog) [An earlier version of this blog mistakenly attributed the comments to Marc Faber's blog. The original comments were made in an interview with Barron's on June 1. The comments were picked up Tuesday in a tracking blog that aggregates Faber's public ... |
Dr. Doom Marc Faber: Don't Bet on New Market Highs CNBC.com Faber said large cap stocks like McDonald's, Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble and Wal-Mart "have most likely peaked." However, he thinks there are still stocks that show strength that could continue to appreciate "because all the money flows into fewer and ... |
Marc Faber Is Glad He Owned Stocks, Even As He Warned Everyone Of Stock ... Business Insider "People with assets are all doomed, because prices are grossly inflated globally for stocks, bonds, and collectibles," says the investment advisor in a new interview published in this week's Barron's. But Faber is the first to admit that at least the ... |
Marc Faber notes liquidity squeeze depressing stocks but still buying gold Gold Seek Famously contrarian in his approach, Dr. Faber is usually out of step with Wall Street but has an excellent reputation for calling the major market turns. He does not say he is shorting equities, though he notes emerging market equities and currencies ... |
Cheerful Thoughts from Marc Faber BullionVault SWISS-BORN Marc Faber, who at age 24 earned his PhD. in economics magna cum laude from the University of Zurich, has lived in Hong Kong nearly 40 years. He worked in New York, Zurich and Hong Kong for White Weld & Co., an investment bank ... |
This post is spot on. In order to emerge from this recession as a stronger nation, we need to take a serious look at how our elected officials are spending our tax dollars. We need to hold all levels of government accountable for where our money is going (or not going). Take, for example, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and their excessive (but not surprising) waste of money.
ReplyDeleteLast year, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Social Services procured for vendor services to operate the county's GAIN case management services (essentially a welfare to work program). Two bids came in from the incumbent company (MAXIMUS, Inc.) and Policy Studies Inc. (PSI). The two companies were scored by a neutral third party, and PSI beat Maximus solidly in several categories, including performance and price. Maximus protested, but the findings were upheld on 3 levels and PSI was recommended by DPSS to receive the contract.
The Board of Supervisors disagreed. They rejected the recommendation with 3 votes. They claimed the process of consensus scoring somehow concealed bias from the DPSS, though no specific evidence of this bias was ever presented. Furthermore, this scoring process was documented as a valid process which had been used for years prior to 2008, and the same process whereby the incumbent Maximus had been recommended and awarded. The BOS then directed the DPSS to extend Maximus' contract for 6 months while they reissue the RFP and devise a new scoring method.
The BOS also expressed some superficial concern that the cost of the contract may exceed county requirements (see County Prop A). Although language could've easily been built into the contract to ensure cost neutrality/savings, the BOS rejected that argument and asked DPSS to review their contract monitoring costs for possible reductions and eliminate or reduce pay for performance provisions that could drive up the overall contract cost should the vendor outperform expectations.
The reissue of this RFP makes no fiscal sense whatsoever, particularly given the dire state of California's economy. What's more, the state faces federal penalties to the tune of approximately $185 million if they do not meet a preexisting federal threshold. Why is the BOS insisting on spending MORE of our tax dollars in an effort to maintain their business relationship with Maximus - a company whose performance was scored lower and contract priced higher than PSI? (The county has estimated the cost to reissue the RFP to be $250,000). If PSI had been chosen, their contract would save the county over one million dollars annually. What's going on here?
An LA Times article from last year exposed just how entangled Maximus is with the BOS. In the first half of 2008, Maximus spent over $124,000 on two lobbying firms, more than doubling what they spent on marketing in the past year. Perhaps even more troubling, Maximus donated $1,000 (the maximum allowed) to the campaigns to re-elect supervisors Don Knabe and Michael D. Antonovich. They even gave $1,000 to two members whose terms had 2 years left to run.
In these lean times, something else must be motivating the board's decisions, because it's certainly not the bottom line.